Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, getting a global score of 83.3 against 73.1. The iPhone 11 design is newer and a bit thinner, but also just a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. IPhone 11 works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
IPhone 11 features a better looking display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a higher 828 x 1792 resolution, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a quite bigger display. Apple iPhone 11 has a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The iPhone 11 shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture and a back facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better video definition and a larger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality. Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 11, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 400 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with a little longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 6% more battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 11 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy J7 Star. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy J7 Star, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.