Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro is way better than the Galaxy J7 Star, getting a overall score of 92.8 against 73.1. The iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie OS. The iPhone 12 Pro body is much newer and thinner, but also a bit heavier than the Galaxy J7 Star. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and 4 GB more RAM.
IPhone 12 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot greater count of pixels per inch in the screen, a lot better 1170 x 2532px resolution and a quite larger display. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lesser megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with better battery life than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.