Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 Star's global score of 73.1. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy J7 Star counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is a much newer and thinner phone than Galaxy J7 Star, although it is also notably heavier.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a bigger display, a much better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a way better resolution of 1284 x 2778. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a much better performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and more RAM memory.
IPhone 12 Pro Max takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max features a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 12% more battery size.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy J7 Star. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.