Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 16.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Blue | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, with a 95.6 score against 73.1. Apple iPhone 14 Pro comes with iOS 16.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy J7 Star works with Android 9.0 Pie OS. Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro is heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, it's just a little thinner and way newer.
IPhone 14 Pro counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a bit bigger display, a much better resolution of 1179 x 2556 and a much greater display density. Apple iPhone 14 Pro has slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
IPhone 14 Pro features a lot better processing power than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with 4 GB more RAM and a 64-bit processor. The iPhone 14 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy J7 Star counts with a little better battery lifetime than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy J7 Star. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy J7 Star, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.