Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone is slightly better than the Galaxy J7 Star, with a general score of 77.1 against 73.1. The Asus ROG Phone is a just a little bit heavier cellphone than Galaxy J7 Star, but both are equally thin. The Asus ROG Phone counts with a better processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone also has more RAM memory.
Asus ROG Phone counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot better pixel density, a little larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160. The Galaxy J7 Star captures greater pictures and videos than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy J7 Star also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
Asus ROG Phone features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. The Asus ROG Phone features superior battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 21% more battery size.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Asus ROG Phone, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy J7 Star, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.