Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Galaxy J7 Star, having an 81.3 score against 73.1. Even when LG V35 ThinQ and the Galaxy J7 Star were only released with a few months difference, LG V35 ThinQ is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features an incredibly better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a quite larger display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a way better pixel number per inch of display. LG V35 ThinQ shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photography, a back-facing camera with more MP and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a battery life that is very similar to the battery duration in Galaxy J7 Star.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.