Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than Galaxy J7 Star, getting a general score of 87.1 against 73.1. LG Velvet's construction is newer, a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy J7 Star. LG Velvet features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2460, a greater display density and a bigger screen. LG Velvet shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet features superior battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
The LG Velvet costs a lot more money than Galaxy J7 Star, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.