Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is way better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, getting an 89.6 score against 73.1. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola edge construction is newer, but a little bit thicker and a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star.
Motorola edge counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola edge also has more RAM memory. The Motorola edge features a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a larger screen, a higher pixels density and a lot better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Motorola edge has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola edge features longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Motorola edge features a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a way more MP camera and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Galaxy J7 Star, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.