Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's score of 73.1. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite body is a lot newer and just a bit thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has just a little better performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a greater count of pixels per inch of display, a larger display and a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a much higher video definition.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.