Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is way better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, getting a 92.8 score against 73.1. Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a a lot newer and a little thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, but it's just a little heavier. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has older 12 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a better display pixel density and a larger display. Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a better performing CPU than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.