Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 overall score. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, but it's just a bit heavier. These phones include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the previous 13 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy J7 Star has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a greater pixels amount in each inch in the screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting images or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a way bigger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.