Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a global score of 86.3, which is better than the Galaxy J7 Star's global score of 73.1. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner than Galaxy J7 Star's, but it is also just a little bit heavier. These phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has older 14 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a way better display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a larger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a higher count of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy J7 Star counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures, a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot better (4K) video resolution and a camera with lot more MP. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with superior battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.