Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Blue | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has an overall score of 80.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 score. These devices have Android OS, but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has 10 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is incredibly newer than Galaxy J7 Star, it is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a larger display and a better display density.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way better (4K) video quality.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 36 percent more battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Nokia 8 V 5G UW, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy J7 Star, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.