Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, getting a general score of 79.9 against 73.1. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has the previous 14 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a a lot newer and just a little thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, but it is also a little bit heavier.
Galaxy J7 Star has a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a better display pixel density, a larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality, a lot better resolution camera in the back and a way better video resolution.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.