Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 score. Samsung Galaxy A52's body is a lot newer and a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's, but it is a little bit heavier. The Galaxy A52 features a little better performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A52 has a much better display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bigger screen and a way better display density. The Galaxy A52 features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 36% more battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better resolution camera in the back and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.