Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is way better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, having a 91.1 score against 73.1. Galaxy A52s is a way newer and just a little thinner device than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, although it is a little heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bit faster processor than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52s counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a larger display, a lot higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a way better pixels number per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A52s has greater battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A52s features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.