Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 Star, having a 92.9 score against 73.1. The Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is extremely newer and a bit thinner, but just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy J7 Star. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit superior processor than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a larger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a higher number of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 36 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a way bigger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy A71 5G UW, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy J7 Star, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.