Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, having a score of 86.2 against 73.1. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, but it is a bit heavier.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a greater amount of pixels per inch of display and a larger screen. Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with a larger camera sensor and a lot better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with superior battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.