Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has a general score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 score. Although the Galaxy Note3 is way older than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, it's construction is a little bit lighter and a little thinner. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note3 has older 4.4.2 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a better pixel count in each inch in the screen, a way better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a little bigger display.
Galaxy Note3 has a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy J7 Star features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 3 percent more battery size.
The Galaxy Note3 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, and they both have a same size back camera sensor and a camera with a 13 MP, the Galaxy Note3 also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.