Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note4 has a global score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 global score. The Galaxy Note4 body is a little lighter and just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, although it was released 4 years before. The Galaxy Note4 features a much sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a little larger screen, a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot greater screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note4 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a larger sensor, a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a higher resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 400 GB.
Galaxy J7 Star features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.