Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-05-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite is better than Galaxy J7 Star, with a general score of 83.6 against 73.1. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite's body is newer and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy J7 Star's, although it's also just a bit heavier. These phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has older 10 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has a much sharper display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a better count of pixels per inch in the screen, a larger screen and a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 400 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.