Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, with an 81.6 score against 73.1. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much better display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a better screen pixels density, a bigger display and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a lot larger sensor and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 144 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.