Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is way better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), with a general score of 88.1 against 71.9. Apple iPhone X is a just a little bit lighter and thinner phone than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), even though both of them were only released 7 months apart. IPhone X features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a little bit larger display, a way better display pixels density and a way better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
IPhone X has a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM and a 64-bit processor. Apple iPhone X counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with improved battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. IPhone X shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.