Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a global score of 82, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s general score of 71.9. Although the iPhone XR and Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) were only released 5 months apart, the iPhone XR construction is a little heavier but just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018).
The Apple iPhone XR has a better processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor and more RAM. The iPhone XR has a better looking screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a better 828 x 1792 pixels resolution and a little bigger display.
Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with much more memory to install applications and games than iPhone XR, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 400 GB. The iPhone XR captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos and a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) has a bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy J7 V (2018). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone XR, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy J7 V (2018), letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.