Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s 71.9 global score. Google Pixel 3 XL's body is just a little heavier but a little thinner than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and both of them were released with only a few months difference. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a lot better pixel number per inch in the screen, a bit bigger screen and a much higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit faster processor than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 4% bigger battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a camera with less mega-pixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot better video definition.
The Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.