Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), having an 81.9 score against 71.9. The Google Pixel 4 is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). Google Pixel 4 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a lot greater quantity of pixels per display inch, a little bit larger screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2280.
Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has a superior storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 400 GB. The Google Pixel 4 features a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy J7 V (2018) has longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 18% more battery size. Google Pixel 4 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a worse resolution camera in the back, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.