Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-06-07 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a general score of 77, which is a little bit better than Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s 71.9 general score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the LG G7 Fit has a newer 8.1 Oreo version while Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo, counting with some additional features. Even though the LG G7 Fit and the Galaxy J7 V (2018) were released with only a couple of months difference, the LG G7 Fit is just a little bit thinner and lighter.
The LG G7 Fit has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a much higher number of pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger screen. The LG G7 Fit has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG G7 Fit also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG G7 Fit has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory. LG G7 Fit has just a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a higher 16 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) features a little better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.