Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 240.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting a overall score of 85.4 against 71.9. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the LG K92 has an older 10 version while Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The LG K92 body is much newer and a bit thinner, but also heavier than the Galaxy J7 V (2018).
The LG K92 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG K92 also has more RAM memory. The LG K92 has a more vivid display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger screen.
The LG K92 captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much more megapixels back-facing camera. The LG K92 features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG K92 counts with better battery life than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG K92 costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.