Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G7 Plus is slightly better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), having a general score of 76.1 against 71.9. Even though the Motorola Moto G7 Plus and Galaxy J7 V (2018) were released only 8 months apart, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G7 Plus has an older 10 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Motorola Moto G7 Plus has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus also has more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G7 Plus features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a lot more pixels per inch of screen, a bit bigger display and a much better 1080 x 2270 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G7 Plus features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with a little longer battery duration than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
The Moto G7 Plus takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Moto G7 Plus also has a back camera with more mega pixels and a way higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.