Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s 71.9 score. Both phones we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Nokia XR20 has the older 11 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Nokia XR20 is a newer cellphone than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it is incredibly heavier and thicker.
Nokia XR20 features a little better processing power than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia XR20 also has 4 GB more RAM. Nokia XR20 has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a larger screen and a greater pixel density.
The Nokia XR20 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory. Nokia XR20 shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a lot better resolution camera and higher video frame rates.
Nokia XR20 features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 4630mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). So if you want that extra features, you can buy Nokia XR20, else you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.