Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s general score of 71.9. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version while Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy Note 5 is an a lot older cellphone than Galaxy J7 V (2018), but Samsung managed to build it a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores. Galaxy Note 5 has a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, a lot greater count of pixels per inch of screen and a quite bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a much better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with a better resolution and a way better video definition. Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 400 GB.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 5 costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.