Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting a general score of 89 against 71.9. Galaxy Note10's body is newer, just a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the Galaxy J7 V (2018). The Galaxy Note10 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher display density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a more powerful processor than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note10 has a superior camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a less MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos.
Galaxy Note10 has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little longer battery life than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy J7 V (2018). If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy J7 V (2018), letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.