Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s score of 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy S22 design is newer, somewhat thinner and a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has way more pixels per screen inch, a little bit larger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better video definition and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy S22 features just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.