Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 has an overall score of 81.7, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s global score of 71.9. The Galaxy S8 is an older phone than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's lighter and a bit thinner anyway. Galaxy S8 has a way better looking display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a bit larger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a lot greater pixels quantity per inch in the display.
Galaxy S8 counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S8 has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S8 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S8 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S8 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S8 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.