Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Galaxy J7 V (2018), with an 81 score against 71.9. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's body is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Galaxy J7 V (2018). Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version while Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a quite bigger display, a much better pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a way higher resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Galaxy XCover Pro costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.