Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 has a score of 79.3, which is much better than Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s global score of 71.9. Xiaomi Poco X2's construction is newer, but heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy J7 V (2018). Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco X2 has 11 version while Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xiaomi Poco X2 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a greater pixels amount in each inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 400 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting images and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera and a much higher video resolution.
Xiaomi Poco X2 has better battery performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.