Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-28 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the Galaxy J8, with a overall score of 81.9 against 76.7. The Google Pixel 4 design has the same thickness than the Galaxy J8, but it's just a bit lighter. Google Pixel 4 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy J8, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater pixels quantity per inch in the display and a way higher 1080 x 2280 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy J8 has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy J8 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy J8, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy J8 has greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 25% more battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy J8, because although it has a lot less MP back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.