Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is better than Samsung Galaxy M10's overall score of 73.5. The LG V40 ThinQ body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy M10, but it is a bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG V40 ThinQ has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a little bigger screen and a way greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a better processing unit than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a less megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution, a lot larger aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy M10, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy M10 has just a bit better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.