Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-07-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M13's 81.1 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M13 has Android 12 version. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older and just a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy M13, it's construction is still a little bit thinner.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better display than Galaxy M13, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a quite bigger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Galaxy M13 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M13, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a camera with lot more MP. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M13, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy M13 has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.