Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-29 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is a little bit better than LG V20, with an 83.3 score against 77. The Galaxy M30s is a notably newer cellphone than the LG V20, although it's somewhat thicker and a little heavier. The LG V20 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
LG V20 features a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V20 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M30s counts with a bit faster processor than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy M30s also has a higher number of faster cores.
The Galaxy M30s has a much better camera than LG V20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy M30s has a much longer battery life than LG V20, because it has an 88 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.