Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-29 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy M30s's 83.3 global score. These phones have Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy M30s has Android 11. LG V50 ThinQ is a a little lighter and a little thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy M30s, even though both were released with only a couple months difference.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy M30s features a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a much smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy M30s features a very superior battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.