Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50, getting a global score of 83.3 against 81.2. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Galaxy M30s construction is noticeably older, somewhat thicker and just a little heavier than Motorola Edge 50. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy M30s has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a just a bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen, a quite larger screen and a slightly better 1220 x 2712px resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 features a bit better camera than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a more mega pixels back facing camera, a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures and videos.
Galaxy M30s counts with better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.