Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 83.3 against 77.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy M30s is a lot older and noticeably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M30s has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better display than Galaxy M30s, because it has a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a bigger display and a bit better pixels number in each screen inch. The Galaxy M30s counts with an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy M30s, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and videos, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality, a camera with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a way higher video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy M30s has just a little better battery lifetime than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.