Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, getting an 86.5 score against 79.7. Even though Galaxy M31 and Motorola Moto G Stylus were released only a couple months apart, Galaxy M31 is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner. Both devices in our current comparison have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has just a bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has a just a bit higher screen pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340. Galaxy M31 has a little faster CPU than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy M31 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy M31 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking images or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels and a larger camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Moto G Stylus has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M31, and although they both have an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy M31 features a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.