Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s has a score of 88, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy M31s has the previous 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Galaxy M31s's body is a little bit lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's extremely thicker and was released 4 years before.
The Galaxy M31s has a way better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy M31s, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a larger display and a just a little higher display pixels density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M31s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has a camera with a much lower 50 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M31s has just a bit longer battery duration than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.