Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s is better than vivo X60 Pro, with an 88 score against 78.8. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy M31s is a somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone than vivo X60 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution and a quite worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy M31s shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with slightly more memory for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy M31s features a much better battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.