Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-18 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy M40's 85 overall score. Apple iPhone X is an older and a little heavier phone than the Galaxy M40, but Apple managed to build it just a little bit thinner anyway. IPhone X has a better hardware performance than Galaxy M40, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone X has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little better screen pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px. The Galaxy M40 counts with a slightly better storage for applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M40 has greater battery life than iPhone X, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh. Galaxy M40 has a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy M40 also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera, a bigger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.