Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-18 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M40, getting a general score of 89 against 85. The Google Pixel 5 body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy M40, but it's somewhat lighter. The Google Pixel 5 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy M40, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy M40, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M40 features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy M40 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 5 features superior battery duration than Galaxy M40, because it has a 17 percent more battery size. Galaxy M40 shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy M40 also counts with a camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.