Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 is much better than the Honor 50 Pro, getting an 85 score against 77. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy M40 has older 10 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version. The Galaxy M40 is a lighter device than Honor 50 Pro, but both are 0.31inches thick. The Honor 50 Pro has a little better performance than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a bit higher 1236 x 2676 pixels resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a little bigger screen. The Honor 50 Pro has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Honor 50 Pro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.