Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-18 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M40 is much better than the HTC U Ultra, getting an 85 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy M40 is a a little lighter phone than the HTC U Ultra, but both are 0.31inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy M40 has a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy M40, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy M40 takes clearer pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments and a back facing camera with a much better 32 mega-pixels resolution.
HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a little better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.